Security
Claim security controls only with implementation evidence
This page defines a proposed review structure for identity and access, encryption, secrets, development, backup and incident response. No production environment has yet been verified as evidence that these controls operate for Werkborg.
Intended delivery
Objective for each implementation: record controls, ownership, evidence status and residual risk in one reviewable security baseline.
Evidence required before delivery
- Required before a public security claim: an implementation-specific control matrix with ownership and evidence status.
- Required before production: a checked architecture diagram, threat review and recovery test.
- Current product boundary: only adapter 1.1.0 is locally tested; zero external actions and no external security audit.
Authority boundary
What this solution explicitly does not promise
- 01
No ISO or other certification claim without a valid certificate and applicable scope.
- 02
Controls owned by the customer, hosting provider or software vendor are identified as such.
Next step
Start with one provable workflow.
No generic AI presentation. Bring volume, systems, exceptions and the human decision-maker.